Should the World Cup axe the third-place game? | The Tylt

Should the World Cup axe the third-place game?

The World Cup final always bring excitement and intrigue, but there is also a match between the defeated semifinal teams to determine who is the third best squad in the world. Some feel the players give minimum effort, making the game pointless to watch. Others feel more World Cup matches can't be bad for those who love the game. What do you think? ⚽ 

FINAL RESULTS
Sports
Should the World Cup axe the third-place game?
A festive crown for the winner
#ForgetThirdPlace
#MoreWorldCup
Dataviz
Real-time Voting
Should the World Cup axe the third-place game?
#ForgetThirdPlace
#MoreWorldCup
#ForgetThirdPlace

Who remembers third place really? The winner is victorious in a meaningless game while risking injury in the process. The players know it and they don't put in the maximum effort because no one wants to put themselves at risk. The World Cup third-place game is pointless.

#MoreWorldCup

More soccer is good soccer. The World Cup can't deny an opportunity to show how beautiful soccer is. Third place isn't a championship, but at least it gives countries another thing to strive for. The World Cup should keep the third-place game.

FINAL RESULTS
Sports
Should the World Cup axe the third-place game?
A festive crown for the winner
#ForgetThirdPlace
#MoreWorldCup