Does the U.S. spend too much on the military? | The Tylt

Does the U.S. spend too much on the military?

The House recently authorized a bipartisan $700 billion defense spending bill. Critics say our military budget is already too big, and we need to start prioritizing domestic spending on health care, education, and infrastructure. But supporters argue America's safety and military must come first. With threats like North Korea on the horizon, cutting defense is a risk we can't afford to take. What do you think?🎖️

FINAL RESULTS
Politics
Does the U.S. spend too much on the military?
A festive crown for the winner
#FundSchoolsNotBombs
#KeepAmericaStrong
Dataviz
Real-time Voting
Does the U.S. spend too much on the military?
#FundSchoolsNotBombs
#KeepAmericaStrong

The House voted overwhelmingly to pass a $700 billion bipartisan defense spending bill, with 127 Democrats backing the measure. The margin exceeds Trump's initial request by $32 billion.

The defense bill for the 2018 fiscal year allots some $634 billion for core Pentagon operations and nearly $66 billion for wartime missions in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria and elsewhere. The funding boost pays for more troops, jet fighters, ships and other weapons needed to halt an erosion of the military’s combat readiness, according to the bill’s backers.
Trump’s 2018 request sought $603 billion for basic functions and $65 billion for overseas missions. 
#FundSchoolsNotBombs

But according to SIPRI, the U.S. already accounts for more than a third of all military spending. This budget means the U.S. would be spending more than three times as much as China on its military, and 10 times as much as Russia. Many on the left say this kind of spending is disgraceful and misguided.

The Senate handed President Donald Trump far more than the $54 billion he asked for. The lavish spending package gives Trump a major legislative victory, allowing him to boast about fulfilling his promise of a “great rebuilding of the armed services.”
#FundSchoolsNotBombs
#KeepAmericaStrong

Others pointed out that the original bill passed with overwhelming bipartisan support in the Senate for a reason—a robust military budget is absolutely essential for American security.

Remember, robust defense funding serves a purpose. It allows the United States to preempt threats before they arrive at our shores. No other country is capable of protecting its interests around the world like the United States, and sustaining a military force that can project power worldwide comes at a cost.
#FundSchoolsNotBombs

Social justice advocates are aghast, and many question how we have enough money for this level of military spending, especially while so many problems go unsolved for everyday Americans.

These problems include skyrocketing health care costs, student loans, childcare, housing and natural disasters. None of these can seem to find additional funding.

#KeepAmericaStrong

Sen. John McCain applauded the passage of the bill, which he strongly supported. Since mid-July, nearly 100 service members have been killed or injured in close to a dozen mishaps. McCain argues that the rash of training accidents and crashes are linked to military budget cuts. He and others say keeping our armed forces safe, secure, and well-equipped are worth every dime we spend.

“My friends, more of our men and women in uniform are now being killed in totally avoidable training accidents and routine operations than by our enemies in combat,” McCain said. “Where is the outrage about this? Where is our sense of urgency to deal with this problem?”
#FundSchoolsNotBombs

But McCain has since scuffled with others, most notably Rand Paul, over defense spending. 

#FundSchoolsNotBombs

And many remain angry that so much money goes to the military rather than education.

#FundSchoolsNotBombs
FINAL RESULTS
Politics
Does the U.S. spend too much on the military?
A festive crown for the winner
#FundSchoolsNotBombs
#KeepAmericaStrong