Should Israel continue expanding settlements in the West Bank? | The Tylt

FINAL RESULTS
Politics
Should Israel continue expanding settlements in the West Bank?
#SettlementsJustified
A festive crown for the winner
#SettlementsBadIdea

Despite a U.N. Security Council resolution condemning Israeli construction of settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, Israel says it will go forward with new settlements in disputed territories. The resolution calls the settlements a "flagrant violation under international law" and an obstacle to peace, but pro-settlement Israelis argue the settlements are not only legal, but historically justified and necessary for Israel's security. What do you think?

Dataviz
Real-time Voting
Should Israel continue expanding settlements in the West Bank?
#SettlementsJustified
#SettlementsBadIdea
#SettlementsBadIdea

Many people argue you can be pro-Israel and still against the expansion of settlements in disputed territory, on the grounds that they are not good for Israel's future. Though the Israeli government is furious that the United States did not veto the Security Council resolution, the U.S. has expressed antipathy towards the settlements for many years. Josh Marshall of Talking Points Memo writes...

The US could have vetoed the resolution but chose not to. This was a clear and deliberate policy decision. What is also clear is that the merest suggestion that the US might not issue a veto was sufficient to get the other members scurrying to come up with something that might pass muster. This is the larger and real point. More or less the entire world—or virtually all the governments of the world—oppose the settlement project.
#SettlementsJustified

Others, including House Speaker Paul Ryan and President-elect Donald Trump, say the U.S. needs to be more supportive of Israel, and strongly oppose any Security Council resolution on settlements.

#SettlementsJustified

Conservative writer Ben Shapiro (along with many others) argues the settlements are perfectly legal.

#SettlementsBadIdea

New York Times writer Nick Kristof opposes the settlements on the grounds that they make a two-state solution and eventual peace impossible.

#SettlementsBadIdea

Many see the United State's rebuke of Israel by allowing UN Security Council condemnation as justified and necessary.

imageSupportingMedia
#SettlementsJustified

But many believe the recent Security Council resolution and opposition to the settlements are simply anti-Semitic, and argue that Israelis have historical claim on the disputed territories. As one commenter noted:

"Fortunately the next US administration understands that Israel should be able to build in the capital city of its ancient homeland. The ultimate chutzpah is that of all 15 countries on the security council only China existed since Jerusalem was the capital city of the Jews, more than 3000 years ago. The idea that they can ask Israel not to build homes for its citizens in its capital city is laughable."
FINAL RESULTS
Politics
Should Israel continue expanding settlements in the West Bank?
#SettlementsJustified
A festive crown for the winner
#SettlementsBadIdea