FBI Director James Comey announced the FBI has not found evidence to support charges against Hillary Clinton. While the way the emails were handled was "extremely reckless," there is no evidence for a criminal case. \n\nShould Comey have recommended for charges to be brought against Clinton? \n\nClinton supporters on social media are hoping people will finally let go of this artificial controversy. The fact is no evidence means no evidence. There's no ulterior motive. Comey has a history of clashing with GOP and Democratic administrations. He is not someone who can be corrupted and he is not a loyal political operative. At a certain point, you're delving into conspiracy theories. \n\nHowever this isn't enough for many of Clinton's detractors. People are blasting Comey saying he's been corrupted, that the Clintons and the Obama administration got to him. People are saying this is another example of how the system is rigged for the elites. Comey in his own words called Clinton's actions "extremely reckless." How is that enough to bring charges against her?\n\nWhat do you think?The Clinton campaign's statement.Paul Ryan's reaction.This is another example of how the system is rigged. FBI Directors aren't subject to political influence. The Clinton campaign's statement.Paul Ryan's reaction.This is another example of how the system is rigged. FBI Directors aren't subject to political influence.