Should Roe v. Wade be overturned? | The Tylt

Should Roe v. Wade be overturned?

Supreme Court Justice Kennedy announced his retirement, and many are worried a new conservative court could overturn Roe v. Wadethe monumental decision that guaranteed women the right to safe and legal abortion. Many legal scholars and anti-abortionists argue the ruling rested on "incredibly shaky reasoning" and there is no right to privacy or abortion in the Constitution. But pro-choice activists say the decision has a legitimate constitutional basis due to the 14th Amendment and is now settled law. What do you think? ⚖️

FINAL RESULTS
Politics
Should Roe v. Wade be overturned?
A festive crown for the winner
#ProtectRoeVWade
#EndRoeVWade
Dataviz
Real-time Voting
Should Roe v. Wade be overturned?
#ProtectRoeVWade
#EndRoeVWade
#ProtectRoeVWade

Justice Anthony Kennedy announced he will retire, and many are worried this will allow President Trump to change the face of the Supreme Court for a generation.

Justice Kennedy, 81, has been a critical swing vote on the sharply polarized court for nearly three decades as he embraced liberal views on gay rights, abortion and the death penalty but helped conservatives trim voting rights, block gun control measures and unleash campaign spending by corporations.
His replacement by a conservative justice — something Mr. Trump has vowed to his supporters — could imperil a variety of landmark Supreme Court precedents on social issues where Justice Kennedy frequently sided with his liberal colleagues, particularly on abortion.

It has been 45 years since the monumental Supreme Court decision that granted women access to safe, legal abortion in the United States. Anti-abortion activists have been trying to overturn Roe v. Wade since 1973, and now there is a real possibility it could happen.

#EndRoeVWade

Roe v. Wade is often called a defining example of "judicial activism." Harvard Law Professor Michael Klarman, an expert on constitutional law and history, says that by handing down the decision the way it did, the Supreme Court overturned abortion laws in 46 states and opened the floodgates for a wave of opposition that has never abated. Whether you're pro-choice or anti-abortion, many say the decision was arrived at and enacted poorly.

"By placing strong protections on abortion rights instead of finding a possible compromise or middleground, such as limiting abortions to the first trimester, the decision sparked extreme resistance fueled by images of fetuses late in the second trimester."Roe put the court on the wrong side of public opinion by extending the right beyond what the public was willing to accept.”
#ProtectRoeVWade

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg, perhaps the court's most ardent champion of reproductive rights, has consistently voted to defend abortion. Yet, even Ginsberg has acknowledged Roe v. Wade was grounded in a shaky interpretation of the constitutional right to privacy—she prefers abortion rights be recognized under the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment.

It’s not that she opposes the holding that recognizes a right to an abortion. It’s that she opposes the logic of the 1973 court’s majority opinion and the constitutional basis under which seven justices arrived at their conclusion.
“Roe isn’t really about the woman’s choice, is it?” the Clinton-appointed justice said last May at the University of Chicago Law School. “It’s about the doctor’s freedom to practice … it wasn’t woman-centered, it was physician-centered.”
#ProtectRoeVWade

But whether or not there is a strong constitutional basis for Roe v. Wade, the fact remains it has been the law for 45 years in the United States, despite countless legal challenges.

For many, including conservatives, stare decisis (Latin for “to stand by things decided") or the doctrine of precedent, weighs heavily as to whether or not the decision should be overturned. A law's longevity matters. Even the conservative Supreme Court justice Neil Gorsuch agreed during his Senate confirmation hearings that Roe v. Wade is the "law of the land."

#EndRoeVWade

On January 19, Trump became the first sitting president to address the annual March for Life.

"The March for Life is a movement born out of love. You love your families, you love your neighbors, you love our nation, and you love every child, born and unborn, because you believe that every life is sacred, that every child is a precious gift from God."
"As you all know, Roe vs. Wade has resulted in some of the most permissive abortion laws anywhere in the world... Under my administration, we will always defend the very first right in the Declaration of Independence, and that is the right to life."
#EndRoeVWade

And before he was elected, Trump promised to appoint judges who were committed to overturning Roe v. Wade.

#EndRoeVWade

And conservatives are happy about it.

FINAL RESULTS
Politics
Should Roe v. Wade be overturned?
A festive crown for the winner
#ProtectRoeVWade
#EndRoeVWade