One day after bombshell quotes from Bob Woodward's new book about the Trump White House surfaced, the administration faced another leak. The New York Times published an op-ed from an anonymous senior White House official who claimed to be actively working against President Donald Trump's agenda. Critics were quick to say the Times should have refused to publish the piece without a name. The Times, however, said the piece was newsworthy enough to run anonymously and the source faced retaliation. What do you think?
Should the New York Times have published the anonymous op-ed?
Join the conversation and vote below
7 Days Until Voting Ends
More from The Tylt
Should the 25th Amendment be used to remove President Trump from office?
Should adults be punished for what they did as teens?
Should misleading political mailers be illegal?