One day after bombshell quotes from Bob Woodward's new book about the Trump White House surfaced, the administration faced another leak. The New York Times published an op-ed from an anonymous senior White House official who claimed to be actively working against President Donald Trump's agenda. Critics were quick to say the Times should have refused to publish the piece without a name. The Times, however, said the piece was newsworthy enough to run anonymously and the source faced retaliation. What do you think?
Should the New York Times have published the anonymous op-ed?
Join the conversation and vote below
THE VOTES ARE IN!
More from The Tylt
Who will win Nevada's Senate seat: Jacky Rosen or Dean Heller?
Who will win Missouri's Senate seat: Claire McCaskill or Josh Hawley?
Have liberal protesters gone too far?