Johns Hopkins psychologist John Gartner has gathered more than 62,000 signatures from mental health professionals attesting that Trump "manifests a serious mental illness that renders him psychologically incapable of competently discharging the duties of president of the United States."
But others argue that offering public comment on the president's psychological health without ever having examined him is a serious violation of ethics, and any medical professional who would do so cannot be trusted. The Goldwater Rule, which prohibits mental health professionals from diagnosing public figures they have not examined in person, and from whom they have not obtained consent to discuss their mental health publicly, exists for a reason.
@realDonaldTrump POTUS' actions may rise some concerns. But it is unethical to come up with this diagnosis without having seen the patient.
Many say these accusations are just more partisan smears from the left, designed to damage the president, whose mental and physical health is obviously fine. Could mental health evaluations be used for political attacks?
When a man acquires billions of dollars through complex real estate transactions, invests in many countries, goes on to phenomenal success in television and turns his name into a worldwide brand, it is very unlikely that he is mentally unstable.
Some of our greatest leaders struggled with mental health issues. Abraham Lincoln was famously depressive—would he have been disqualified by a mental health exam?
A recent study at Duke concluded that several past presidents had signs of bipolar disorder—Lyndon Johnson and Theodore Roosevelt among them. Nearly 8 percent of past presidents exhibited evidence of alcohol abuse or dependence.
Psychology Today cites one author who argues some mental illnesses could actually equip leaders to perform well in times of crisis, as they may be more able to cope with upheaval and uncertainty. Would psychological testing deprive us of a worthy president?
Jimmy Carter wanted to create a panel of physicians who would routinely evaluate the Commander-In-Chief's psychological health.
"Many people have called to my attention the continuing danger to our nation from the possibility of a U.S. president becoming disabled, particularly by a neurologic illness," Carter wrote in a December 1994 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association.