Do long lines at the polls equal voter suppression? | The Tylt

FINAL RESULTS
Do long lines at the polls equal voter suppression?
A festive crown for the winner
#LinesSuppressVotes
#NoRightToShortLines

Thousands of people in states like North Carolina, Ohio, Arizona, and Florida are waiting in three-hour-long lines to cast a vote. Many believe that forcing citizens to stand in line for hours is back-door voter suppression. Critics also argue long lines discriminate against the elderly, the disabled, and people who can't take out too much time to vote. Others say it's a small price to pay for participating in a democracy. What do you think? Read more below and vote now (no line!).

Dataviz
Real-time Voting
Do long lines at the polls equal voter suppression?
#LinesSuppressVotes
#NoRightToShortLines
#LinesSuppressVotes

We seem to have this discussion every time there's a presidential election. A 2012 bipartisan commission—which is set up to examine the voting experience in the U.S.—declared that voters shouldn't have to wait any longer than 30 minutes. But a Supreme Court ruling in 2013 essentially ended the provisions of the Voting Rights Act. Many states reduced the number of polling places drastically.

#LinesSuppressVotes

Because so many of the long lines disproportionately affect districts with people of color, the NAACP has declared unequivocally that lines are a form of voter suppression.

#NoRightToShortLines

But others argue Americans wait in line all the time for all kinds of things. This doesn't necessarily equal voter suppression.

#LinesSuppressVotes

Some people work tight schedules and can't spend too much time in line to vote.

#NoRightToShortLines

Sure, it's inconvenient. But others argue inconvenience does not equal suppression.

FINAL RESULTS
Do long lines at the polls equal voter suppression?
A festive crown for the winner
#LinesSuppressVotes
#NoRightToShortLines