Daniel Craig is done playing 007. Who should replace him? | The Tylt
Daniel Craig reportedly turned down £68 million (a.k.a. $99 million) to do two more films as James Bond! This makes total sense! Just last year he said, "I’d rather break this glass and slash my wrists" than to play 007 again. However, he also said if he did come back it would be for the money. Was it not enough?!!
But more importantly, who should replace him as 007?
Although some are sad to see him go, others are once again advocating for his replacement. The two most popular choices: Idris Elba and Tom Hiddleston. Fans have been advocating for Elba to play Bond for quite some time, sparking controversy over the fact that we never had a Black Bond. On the other hand, Hiddleston is also a popular choice, and rumor has it, he's in talks for the role.
Who do you think: #Elba007 or #Hiddleston007?
Daniel Craig is done playing 007. Who should replace him?
I can't even imagine how much Daniel Craig must have hated Bond to turn down SIXTY-EIGHT MILLION to escape two further films— Camilla Long (@camillalong) May 19, 2016
Frankly, Daniel Craig, I'm not sure I want to go back to Bond either after seeing SPECTRE— Greg Wyshynski (@wyshynski) May 19, 2016
Gotta respect Daniel Craig and Christian Bale for turning down insane sums of money to not bleed a franchise dry. If only RDJ would learn— Black Phillip (@swanye_west) May 19, 2016
I do not see Tom Hiddleston as Bond. I just don't. Would be equally happy with either Idris Elba or Tom Hardy taking over. My 2 cents.— Hutch (@z0mgItsHutch) May 19, 2016