Should the US build green energy infrastructure instead of pipelines? | The Tylt

Should the US build green energy infrastructure instead of pipelines?

Gas prices are skyrocketing in the Southeast due to a gas pipeline leak. In recent weeks, Native Americans in North Dakota have been protesting the construction of DAPL, fearing leaks could pollute the local drinking water supply. Pipeline critics say the United States should invest in clean, green energy. But oil and gas supporters say fossil fuel infrastructure is needed to make America energy independent, to reduce rail transit accidents, and to create jobs. What do you think? Vote below.

FINAL RESULTS
Culture
Should the US build green energy infrastructure instead of pipelines?
A festive crown for the winner
#InvestInGreen
#InvestInOil
Dataviz
Real-time Voting
Should the US build green energy infrastructure instead of pipelines?
#InvestInGreen
#InvestInOil
#InvestInGreen

People think it's more important to invest in clean energy over oil infrastructure. If the United States is truly committed to a green future as a society, it needs to invest in infrastructure that allows renewable energy to flourish. For example, gas is so readily available and cheap because of the massive infrastructure making it possible. 

In order to illustrate the vast infrastructure that makes oil—and modern life—possible, Planet Money bought a 100 barrels of oil and tracked it through the system. Spoiler alert: There are a lot of players involved. 

#InvestInGreen

A look at DAPL's investors reveals a tangled web of financial and energy interests. There's a lot of money to be made in oil and oil infrastructure, despite obvious reasons to move away from it.

This is how environmentalists frame the situation: The world is at a tipping point. We can continue down this path and fundamentally change the world as we know it, or we can take radical action now, and preserve the world for the future. One of the ways of taking radical action is to say no to increasing oil infrastructure, bear those costs, and instead invest in the infrastructure that would make renewable energy possible. 

#InvestInOil

However, supporters of investing in oil infrastructure say oil is too integrated in society to stop cold turkey. The fact is the United States is the largest producer of oil. That oil has to be transported, refined and brought to market. The energy industry argues that pipelines are needed because right now, the U.S. is moving its oil unsafely by train, through cities across the nation. More pipelines would make the process safer and more efficient.

Additionally, most consumer products rely on oil in some way. Oil helps to make many of the things we take for granted possible

#InvestInOil

Others argue that while a good idea, keeping oil in the ground is not likely to be the best policy to stop climate change. There are other policies which would have a larger impact. Pipeline supporters argue that preventing the construction of oil infrastructure only keeps transporting oil unsafe. The oil is going to be used either way. 

FINAL RESULTS
Culture
Should the US build green energy infrastructure instead of pipelines?
A festive crown for the winner
#InvestInGreen
#InvestInOil