Is J.K. Rowling's Twitter feed better than 'Harry Potter'? | The Tylt

Dataviz
Real-time Voting
Is J.K. Rowling's Twitter feed better than 'Harry Potter'?
#RowlingsTwitter
#RowlingsPotter
#RowlingsTwitter

J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter" series may have wrapped its seventh book almost exactly 10 years ago this month, but she remains an integral part of the conversation. Her Twitter presence is a joy. 

She gets real, she trolls the trolls, she voices political opinions, and sometimes even reveals tantalizing insight into the Harry Potter universe. She was one of the 30 most influential people on the Internet in 2016, after all. 

#RowlingsPotter

But Rowling recently fell prey to fake news, accusing President Trump of willfully ignoring a boy in a wheelchair at an event. After catching flak for reacting to incomplete footage, Rowling did apologize. 

Her tweets, while often funny and engaging, might not compare to the lasting legacy of the seven-part series that profoundly changed a generation (or two). Harry Potter made children's literature an unstoppable force in defining modern culture.

#RowlingsTwitter

Can we really forget this flawless pun battle Rowling had with Chamillionaire? That's living, breathing Internet culture.

#RowlingsPotter

Rowling's "Harry Potter" series was hugely influential in just its book form, but it took on many other forms over the past two decades. Fan sites, Pottermore, "Cursed Child," theme parks—and not to forget the massive film franchise that made $7.7 billion worldwide. That's a heck lot of influence. 

FINAL RESULTS
Culture
Is J.K. Rowling's Twitter feed better than 'Harry Potter'?
#RowlingsTwitter
#RowlingsPotter